The AW3423DW does have a G-SYNC Ultimate module. I'm not in the market for a new display yet, but these two are certainly towards the top of what I would want. The fact that this has an 1800R curve unlike Samsung's standard 1000R makes me pretty happy. The other difference is that by not having the GSYNC module the power consumption, especially in low power modes, ought to be a fair bit lower. A few things that could make a significant difference: Metteec said:An obvious comparison with the new Samsung G8QNB is the Alienware AW3423DW, the first commercially available QD-OLED monitor, that uses the same Samsung panel. I would imagine Samsung's offering would be at or less than the Alienware. The Alienware AW3423DW starts at $1,299 plus tax and shipping. Samsung typically offers 1-year warranty. OLED TVs of yesterday experienced horrible burn-in problems. G8QNB's built-in speakers are a nice touch.Īlienware offers an industry leading 3-year burn-in protection/advanced replacement warranty on the AW3423DW. If Samsung uses polarized coating, like on its C9, the G8QNB could be superior in bright conditions. Screen coating on the AW3423DW absorbs light, and in bright conditions, blacks can appear grey. The AW3423DW is not as heavy as IPS panels, but still takes up a lot of desk space. You need to reduce to 144 Hz to get 10-bit however, most people do not notice a difference on this monitor between 10-bit 144 Hz versus 8-bit 175 Hz The AW3423DW GSYNC ultimate chip is not able to deliver 10-bit color at 175 Hz. The generation of GSYNC/FreeSync is important. An obvious comparison with the new Samsung G8QNB is the Alienware AW3423DW, the first commercially available QD-OLED monitor, that uses the same Samsung panel.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |